Welcome to visit The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, Today is
Flow & Transfer

Numerical simulation of coalescence of double bubbles using FTM

  • Jie LEI Yu WANG Ming MA Peisheng LI Ying ZHANG
Expand
  • 1. School of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330031, China 2. Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, America

Received date: 2018-05-22

  Revised date: 2018-09-18

  Online published: 2019-04-18

Abstract

The front tracking method (FTM), which can track the maker points and capture the changes of the interface accurately was used to simulate the phenomenon of bubble coalescence. All governing equations were solved by using a second-order accurate project method, using centered-differences on a fixed, staggered grid and considering the effect of surface tension at the interface. The numerical simulations were compared with experimental and computational results from other literatures which modified the accuracy of calculation model. In this work, the rising process of coaxial bubbles and the process after fusion were analyzed in detail, and the existence of specific initial angle ?c and the relationship between ?c and Eotvos number (Eo) were analyzed. It was found that the rising velocity of both bubbles were higher than single bubble, and the coalesced bubble had the equal velocity with equivalent diameter single bubble in the rising process of coaxial double bubbles. The trailing bubble had higher velocity with the shorter distance of bubbles. In the range of Eo of leading bubble was 0.36~9, the time of rising stage was shorter and the time of contact stage was longer when the Eo of leading bubble increased. During contact stage, the thickness of liquid film between bubbles decreased because of the effect of pressure. Liquid film broke and coalescence of bubbles happened in the coalescence moment. The required time of coalescence increased as the distance of bubbles or Eo increased. However, the required time was stable as Eo was larger than 4.16. When the Morton number (Mo) was 0.57 and the range of Eo of leading bubble was 5.04~18.72, it was found that there was a specific initial angle ?c. The two bubbles repelled each other for 0?≤?≤?c but merge for ?c≤?≤90?, and ?c decreased with the increase of Eo.

Cite this article

Jie LEI Yu WANG Ming MA Peisheng LI Ying ZHANG . Numerical simulation of coalescence of double bubbles using FTM[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2019 , 19(2) : 263 -270 . DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.218221

References

[1]Clift R, Grace J R, Weber M E.Bubbles, Drops, and Particles[M]. Academic Press, 1978
[2]Hasan N, Zakaria Z B.Computational Approach for A Pair of Bubble Coalescence Process[J].International Journal of Heat & Fluid Flow, 2011, 32(3):755-761
[3]Prince Michael J, Blanch Harvey W.Bubble Coalescence and Break-Up in Air Sparged Bubble Columns[J].Aiche Journal, 2010, 36(10):1485-1499
[4]Sanada T, Sato A, Shirota M, et al.Motion and Coalescence of A Pair of Bubbles Rising Side by Side[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(11):2659-2671
[5]Su?ol F, González-Cinca R.Rise,Bouncing and Coalescence of Bubbles Impacting at A Free Surface[J].Colloids & Surfaces A Physicochemical & Engineering Aspects, 2010, 365(1):36-42
[6]Ma M, Lu J, Tryggvason G.Using Statistical Learning to Close Two-Fluid Multiphase Flow Equations for A Simple Bubbly System[J].Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27(9):093303-110
[7]Tan Y H, Finch J A.Frother Structure-Property Relationship: Effect of Hydroxyl Position in Alcohols on Bubble Rise Velocity[J].[J].Minerals Engineering, 2016, 92(1):1-8
[8]Cai Z, Gao Z, Bao Y, et al.Formation and Motion of Conjunct Bubbles in Glycerol–Water Solutions[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(4):1990-1996
[9]Anwar S.Lattice Boltzmann Modeling of Buoyant Rise of Single and Multiple Bubbles[J].Computers & Fluids, 2013, 88(88):430-439
[10]Balcázar N, Lehmkuhl O, Jofre L, et al.Level-Set Simulations of Buoyancy-Driven Motion of Single and Multiple Bubbles[J][J].International Journal of Heat & Fluid Flow, 2015, 56(56):91-107
[11]Abbassi W, Besbes S, Elhajem M, et al.Numerical Simulation of Free Ascension and Coaxial Coalescence of Air Bubbles Using the Volume of Fluid Method (VOF)[J][J].Computers & Fluids, 2017, 161(1):47-59
[12]Chakraborty I, Biswas G, Ghoshdastidar P S.A Coupled Level-Set and Volume-of-Fluid Method for the Buoyant Rise of Gas Bubbles in Liquids[J].International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 2013, 58(1-2):240-259
[13]Pozorski, Szewc.Simulations of Single Bubbles Rising through Viscous Liquids Using; Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics[J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2013, 50(50):98-105
[14]Unverdi S O, Tryggvason G.A Front-Tracking Method for Viscous,Incompressible,Multi-Fluid Flows[J].J.comput.phys, 1992, 100(1):25-37
[15]D.Bhaga,ME. Weber. Bubbles in Viscous Liquids: Shapes,Wakes and Velocities[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 105(105):61-85
Outlines

/