Welcome to visit The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, Today is
Reviews

Mechanisms and suppression methods for attrition and carbon deposition of oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion

  • Ying HU Xuefeng YIN He CHANG Xueyan FENG Zejia WANG Xuehui HAO Zhijuan GUO
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Waste Recycling in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Department of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010021, China

Received date: 2019-04-25

  Revised date: 2019-09-05

  Online published: 2020-05-18

Abstract

The formation of carbon deposition causes the oxygen carrier (OC) to not fully contact with the fuel, and the attrition causes the loss of oxygen carriers, which seriously disturb the normal operation of chemical looping combustion (CLC). Cyclic combustion efficiency of oxygen carriers is closely related to the cost of CLC technology, and it is an important part of its near commercialization. The basic concepts, devices, reaction conditions, fuel composition and reaction process of CLC were introduced in this work. Two major problems in current CLC research were analyzed and summarized. The main contents included that: (1) prolonging the cycle life cycle of oxygen carriers providing combustion oxygen demand, (2) under the optimum reaction conditions, the mechanism of carbon deposition and the measures to solve the oxygen loss caused by carbon deposition were analyzed. Firstly, the oxygen carrier?s selection, preparation methods and characteristics briefly were introduced. Different oxygen carriers had their own advantages and disadvantages, it should select suitable oxygen carriers for different fuels. The attrition analysis of oxygen carriers point was carried out. Analysts believed that with industrial significance a way to select qualified oxygen carriers materials based on attrition resistance. Secondly, the reaction mechanism of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and the precursor of carbon black deposit were analyzed in detail by analyzing the detailed reaction in the whole process of CLC. It was concluded that the carbon deposit was mainly caused by the reaction of hydrocarbons pyrolyzed by fuel with oxygen carriers and Boudouard reaction. The corresponding solutions for different types of carbon deposit were proposed. Among them, the combination of steam injection and carbon dioxide reflux injection was promising. On this basis, the potential research needs in this field were also discussed. To improve the cycle period of oxygen carriers and restrain carbon deposition, future research should focus on the characterization and reactivity of carbon deposition on the surface of oxygen carriers, the cyclic growth model of oxygen carriers under optimal combustion conditions and the reaction mechanism of particles, as well as the exploration of new technologies for coupling removal of carbon deposition.

Cite this article

Ying HU Xuefeng YIN He CHANG Xueyan FENG Zejia WANG Xuehui HAO Zhijuan GUO . Mechanisms and suppression methods for attrition and carbon deposition of oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2020 , 20(5) : 493 -502 . DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.219188

References

[1] Omoniyi OA, Dupont V. Optimised cycling stability of sorption enhanced chemical looping steam reforming of acetic acid in a packed bed reactor [J]. Applied Catalysis B-Environmental, 2019, 242: 397-409.
[2] Hong H, Jin HG. A novel solar thermal cycle with chemical looping combustion [J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2005, 2(4): 397-407.
[3] Moon JH, Jo SH, Park SJ, et al. Carbon dioxide purity and combustion characteristics of oxy firing compared to air firing in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed [J]. Energy, 2019, 166: 183-192.
[4] Li J, Zhang H, Gao Z, et al. CO2 capture with chemical looping combustion of gaseous fuels: an overview [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(4): 3475-3524.
[5] Ryu H-J. Selection of the best oxygen carrier for chemical looping combustion in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor [J]. Clean Technology, 2018, 24(1): 63-69.
[6] Kimball E, Lambert A, Fossdal A, et al. Reactor choices for chemical looping combustion (CLC) - dependencies on materials characteristics [J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 567-574.
[7] Patel HA, Byun J, Yavuz CT. Carbon dioxide capture adsorbents: chemistry and methods [J]. Chemsuschem, 2017, 10(7): 1303-1317.
[8] Cuadrat A, Abad A, Labiano F, et al. Ilmenite as oxygen carrier in a chemical looping combustion system with coal [J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 362-369.
[9] Mendiara T, Diego LF, Labiano F, et al. Behaviour of a bauxite waste material as oxygen carrier in a 500 Wth CLC unit with coal [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 17: 170-182.
[10] Sun Z, Lu DY, Hughes RW, et al. O-2 uncoupling behaviour of ilmenite and manganese-modified ilmenite as oxygen carriers [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 169: 15-23.
[11] Lee D, Bae D, Shun D, et al. Comparison of reduction reactivity of new oxygen carriers for chemical looping combustion system in a bubbling fluidized bed [J]. The Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society, 2017, 28(5): 554-560.
[12] Jing D, Mattisson T, Ryden M, et al. Innovative oxygen carrier materials for chemical-looping combustion [J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 645-653.
[13] Scala F, Chirone R, Salatino P. Attrition phenomena relevant to fluidized bed combustion and gasification systems [J]. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, 2013, 30(1): 254–315.
[14] Cabello A, Gayan P, Labiano F, et al. On the attrition evaluation of oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 148: 188-197.
[15] Qin W, Lin C, Cheng W, et al. Enhancing the activity of iron based oxygen carrier via surface controlled preparation for lignite chemical looping combustion [J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities-Chinese, 2015, 36(1): 116-123.
[16] Nguyen HNT, Seemann M, Thunman H. Fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during tertiary tar formation in steam gasification of biomass [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(3): 3499-3509.
[17] Mattisson T, Johansson M, Lyngfelt A. The use of NiO as an OC in chemical looping combustion [J]. Fuel, 2006, 85: 736?747.
[18] Soo YH, Il CS, Park C, et al. Characteristics of redox of oxygen carriers with NiO/AiPO4 for chemical-looping combustion [J]. Applied Chemistry for Engineering, 2004, 15(2): 200-204.
[19] 梁志永. 铁基载氧体深层氧化CO以及积碳形成机理研究 [D]. 北京:华北电力大学; 2017.
[20] Li JH, Lin CF, Qin W, et al. Synergetic effect of mercury adsorption on the catalytic decomposition of CO over perfect and reduced Fe2O3 001 surface [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2016, 32(11): 2717-2723.
[21] 覃吴, 林常枫, 龙东腾, 等. 高指数晶面结构氧化铁化学链燃烧反应活性及深层还原反应机理 [J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(04): 667-675.
Qin W, Lin CF, Long DT, et al. Reaction activity and deep reduction reaction mechanism of a high index iron oxide surface in chemical looping combustion [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(04): 667-675.
[22] 白雪峰, 尹雪峰, 邓玉洁, 等. CaSO_4/膨润土载氧体煤直接化学链燃烧中PAHs的生成 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(07): 1854-1862.
[23] 梁志永, 董长青, 覃吴, 等. 化学链燃烧中铁基载氧体性能优化研究综述 [J]. 现代化工, 2017, 37(02): 36-40.
[24] Veranth JM, Fletcher TH, Pershing DW, et al. Measurement of soot and char in pulverized coal fly ash [J]. Fuel, 2000, 79(9): 1067–1075.
[25] Richter H, Howard JB. Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their growth to soot-a review of chemical reaction pathways [J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2000, 26(5): 565–608.
[26] Blacha T, Domenico MD, Gerlinger P, et al. Soot predictions in premixed and non-premixed laminar flames using a sectional approach for PAHs and soot [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(1): 181–193.
[27] Hansen N, Schenk M, Moshammer K, et al. Investigating repetitive reaction pathways for the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in combustion processes [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2017, 180: 250-261.
[28] Houben MP, Lange HC, Steenhoven AA. Tar reduction through partial combustion of fuel gas [J]. Fuel, 2005, 84: 817?824.
[29] Sim CY, Brown T, Chen Q, et al. Particle characterisation in chemical looping combustion [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 69(1): 211-224.
[30] Jin H, Ishida M. A new type of coal gas fueled chemical looping combustion [J]. Fuel, 2004, 83: 2411?2417.
[31] Hua X, Wang W. Chemical looping combustion: A new low-dioxin energy conversion technology [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 32: 135-145.
[32] Mantripragada HC, Rubin ES. Chemical looping for pre-combustion and post-combustion CO2 capture [J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 6403-6410.
[33] Haus J, Goltzsche M, Hartge EU, et al. Gasification kinetics of lignite char in a fluidized bed of reactive oxygen carrier particles [J]. Fuel, 2019, 236: 166-178.
Outlines

/