气固两相流内中空多孔催化剂性能的数值模拟

doi:10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.220229

过程工程学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (7): 774-785.DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.220229CSTR: 32067.14.jproeng.220229

气固两相流内中空多孔催化剂性能的数值模拟

吴秋莹¹^,²(), 孔令凯²^,³, 徐骥²^,⁴(), 葛蔚²^,³^,⁴, 袁绍军¹()

^1.四川大学化学工程学院，四川成都 610065
^2.中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室，北京 100190
^3.中国科学院大学化学工程学院，北京 100049
^4.中国科学院绿色过程制造创新研究院，北京 100190

收稿日期:2020-07-20 修回日期:2020-08-07 出版日期:2021-07-28 发布日期:2021-07-27
作者简介:吴秋莹(1995-)，女，四川省资阳市人，硕士研究生，化学工程，E-mail: qywu@ipe.ac.cn；通讯联系人
徐骥，E-mail: xuji@ipe.ac.cn
袁绍军, E-mail: ysj@scu.edu.cn.
基金资助:
中国科学院信息化专项课题(XXH13506-301);国家自然科学基金委重大计划集成项目(91834303);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB0202203);工业化虚拟过程平台的研发与典型应用(IAGM-2019-A03);中国科学院前沿科学重点研究项目(QYZDJ-SSW-JSC029);挑战计划国防基础科研科学挑战专题(TZ2016001)

Numerical simulation of hollow catalyst with pores in gas-solid reaction system

Qiuying WU¹^,²(), Lingkai KONG²^,³, Ji XU²^,⁴(), Wei GE²^,³^,⁴, Shaojun YUAN¹()

^1.School of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China
^2.State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
^3.School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
^4.Innovation Academy for Green Manufacture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2020-07-20 Revised:2020-08-07 Online:2021-07-28 Published:2021-07-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

气固流态化过程中流体和颗粒分别聚集，形成稀密两相，严重限制其传质效率和反应速率的提高。针对此问题，本工作设计了一种中空多孔结构的催化剂颗粒，通过模拟方法研究该颗粒对稀密两相气相传质与反应的影响，及其在稀密相间转换的时间尺度。结果表明，一定的流动强度时，在颗粒稀密相转换的时间尺度内，中空多孔结构的颗粒能够有效地在稀相存储反应气体，并在密相释放，为密相提供额外的反应气体，增强体系的整体反应效率。当催化反应速率高于传质速率时，在所研究的流动条件下中空多孔颗粒体系的反应效率比实心球形颗粒体系高出26.92%~29.55%。可以预见在稀密相分布更广的大型气固流化床反应器中，中空多孔结构的催化剂颗粒能够更为有效地提高反应器的整体效率。

关键词: 中空多孔催化剂, 气固流态化, 传质速率, 反应速率, 数值模拟

Abstract:

In the gas-solid flow, fluid and particle usually aggregate to form dense-phase and dilute-phase respectively, resulting in unbalanced mass transfer and reaction rates between the dense- and dilute-phase. The unbalance of dilute- and dense-phase reduces the overall efficiency of the reactor. To solve this problem, a hollow catalyst particle with pores structure is designed. It is aimed to enhance the overall efficiency of fluidized reactors by improving the mass transfer rate between the dense- and dilute-phase. Dense- and dilute-phase are widely distributed during fluidization processes, which can be respectively described by the cluster system and single particle system. In these two phases, the flow, reaction process and mass transfer process of hollow porous particles are studied by numerical simulation, and compared with the solid spherical particle system at the same fluidization condition. Then, the frequency of particle clusters formation and breakage is studied under various fluidization conditions. The time scale is analyzed to measure the possibility of gas transport in the fluidization process. It is found that the time-scales of the mass transfer, the reaction, and the movements of particles between the dilute- and dense-phase could be at the same order for some fluidization conditions. Thus, hollow porous catalyst particle can store the reacting material in the dilute-phase efficiently. When moving to the dense phase, the particle would release the reacting material to provide additional material for the dense-phase reaction. When the reaction is faster than the mass transfer, the overall reaction rate of the hollow porous catalyst system is 26.92%~29.55% higher than that of the solid spherical catalyst system at the studied conditions. It could be predicted that this hollow porous catalyst would be capable to improve the overall reaction efficiency of large gas-solid fluidized bed reactors due to wider distributions of the dilute- and dense-phase.

Key words: hollow porous catalyst, gas-solid flow, mass transfer rate, reaction rate, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TQ021

吴秋莹, 孔令凯, 徐骥, 葛蔚, 袁绍军. 气固两相流内中空多孔催化剂性能的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021, 21(7): 774-785.

Qiuying WU, Lingkai KONG, Ji XU, Wei GE, Shaojun YUAN. Numerical simulation of hollow catalyst with pores in gas-solid reaction system[J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2021, 21(7): 774-785.

图/表 21

图1 催化剂结构及其计算网格

Fig.1 Catalyst structures and the computing meshes

表1 模拟参数

Table 1 Parameters of numerical simulation

Parameter	Value
Particle diameter/m	5.0×10^-3
Grid size/m	5.0×10^-4~2.0×10^-3
Time step/s	2.0×10^-5~5.0×10^-5
Inlet mass fraction of A	1.0
Inlet mass fraction of B	0.0
Inlet mass fraction of I	0.0

图2 单颗粒模拟体系

Fig.2 Single particle simulation system

图3 A组分的质量分数分布

Fig.3 Mass fraction distributions of A component

表2 单个实心球形催化剂的颗粒舍伍德数

Table 2 Particle Sherwood number (Shs) of the single solid spherical catalyst

Re_s	Frössling	Ranz-Marshall	Lu et al^[27]	Simulation
10	3.75	3.90	3.68	3.80
20	4.47	4.68	4.51	4.79
40	5.49	5.79	5.67	6.14
60	6.28	6.65	6.56	7.16
100	7.52	8.00	7.94	8.51
200	9.81	10.49	10.46	11.31

表3 稀相体系模拟参数设置

Table 3 Parameters of numerical simulation in dilute phase

Parameter	Value
Particle diameter/m	1.0×10^-4
Grid size/m	1.0×10^-5~5.0×10^-5
Time step/s	1.0×10^-7
Inlet mass fraction of A	0.9
Inlet mass fraction of B	0.0
Inlet mass fraction of I	0.1

图4 气相速度分布(Res=10)：(a) 实心球形颗粒；(b) 中空多孔颗粒

Fig.4 The velocity distributions (Res=10): (a) solid spherical particle; (b) hollow porous particle

图5 产物B的质量分数演化(Res=10)：(a) 实心球形颗粒；(b) 中空多孔颗粒

Fig.5 The mass fractions of product B (Res=10): (a) solid spherical particle; (b) hollow porous particle

图6 中空多孔颗粒体系反应气体A的质量分数演化(Res=10)

Fig.6 The mass fractions of reactant A in hollow porous particle systems (Res=10)

图 7 中空多孔颗粒空腔内反应气体A的存储量及增速变化(Res=10)

Fig.7 The storage of the gas reactant A and its growth rate in hollow porous particles (Res=10)

图8 中空多孔颗粒存储反应气体A的过程

Fig.8 The process of storing gas reactant A in hollow porous particles

图9 颗粒聚团模拟体系

Fig.9 Particle cluster simulation system

表4 颗粒聚团体系模拟参数设置

Table 4 Parameter of numerical simulation in dense phase

Parameter	Value
Particle diameter/m	1.0×10^-4
Grid size/m	1.0×10^-5~5.0×10^-5
Time step/s	1.0×10^-7
Inlet mass fraction of A	0.1
Inlet mass fraction of B	0.0
Inlet mass fraction of I	0.9

图10 中空多孔颗粒空腔内剩余A组分的平均质量分数

Fig.10 The average mass fraction of the reactant A remaining in the cavity of hollow porous catalyst

图11 颗粒聚团体系内气相速度分布(Res=10)：(a) 实心球形颗粒；(b) 中空多孔颗粒

Fig.11 Velocity distributions in particle cluster system (Res=10): (a) solid spherical particle; (b) hollow porous particle

图12 颗粒聚团体系中产物B的质量分数分布(Res=10)：(a) 实心球形颗粒；(b) 中空多孔颗粒

Fig.12 The mass fractions of product B in particle cluster system (Res=10): (a) solid spherical particle; (b) hollow porous particle

图13 颗粒聚团体系中气体A的质量分数分布(Res=10)：(a) 实心球形颗粒；(b) 中空多孔颗粒

Fig.13 The mass fractions of reactant A in particle cluster system (Res=10): (a) solid spherical particle; (b) hollow porous particle

图14 模拟体系设置

Fig.14 Configuration of the simulation system

图15 孔隙率分布(Res=10)

Fig.15 Porosity distributions of particle clusters (Res=10)

图16 聚团聚散频率分析(Res=2)

Fig.16 Analysis of particle aggregation and dispersion (Res=2)

图17 聚团聚散频率分析(Res=10)

Fig.17 Analysis of particle aggregation and dispersion (Res=10)

参考文献 43

1	郭慕孙, 李洪钟. 流态化手册 [M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2008: 150-159.
	Kwauk M, Li H Z. Handbook of fluidization [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2008: 150-159.
2	金涌, 祝京旭, 汪展文. 流态化工程原理 [M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2001: 2-14.
	Jin Y, Zhu J X, Wang Z W. Fluidization engineering principles [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua Univeristy Press, 2001: 2-14.
3	李洪钟, 郭慕孙. 回眸与展望流态化科学与技术 [J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(1): 52-60.
	Li H Z, Kwauk M. Review and prospect of fluidization science and technology [J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(1): 52-60.
4	Amjadi O, Tahmasebpoor M. Improving fluidization behavior of cohesive Ca(OH)₂ adsorbent using hydrophilic silica nanoparticles: parametric investigation [J]. Particuology, 2018, 40: 52-61.
5	Kashyap M, Tadiboyina M R, Okolo C, et al. Improving circulating fluidized bed dehydrogenation technology through optimization of fluidization [J]. Particuology, 2020, 50: 127-134.
6	Yu Y, Zhang C, Zhang Z, et al. Characterizing the catalyst fluidization with field synergy to improve the amine absorption for CO₂ capture [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27(7): 1608-1617.
7	Zhou C, Fan X, Duan C, et al. A method to improve fluidization quality in gas-solid fluidized bed for fine coal beneficiation [J]. Particuology, 2019, 43: 181-192.
8	李洪钟, 郭慕孙. 气固流态化的散式化 [M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2002: 38-52.
	Li H Z, Kwauk M. Particulatization of gas-solid fluidization [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002: 38-52.
9	Liu B, Zhang X, Wang L, et al. Fluidization of non-spherical particles: sphericity, Zingg factor and other fluidization parameters [J]. Particuology, 2008, 6(2): 125-129.
10	Hilton J E, Mason L R, Cleary P W. Dynamics of gas-solid fluidised beds with non-spherical particle geometry [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(5): 1584-1596.
11	Nan W, Wang Y, Wang J. Numerical analysis on the fluidization dynamics of rodlike particles [J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2016, 27(5): 2265-2276.
12	Mandø M, Rosendahl L. On the motion of non-spherical particles at high Reynolds number [J]. Powder Technology, 2010, 202(1/2/3): 1-13.
13	Li X, Visaveliya N, Hafermann L, et al. Hierarchically structured particles for micro flow catalysis [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 326: 1058-1065.
14	Cheng Q, Tian Y, Lyu S, et al. Confined small-sized cobalt catalysts stimulate carbon-chain growth reversely by modifying ASF law of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis [J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 1-9.
15	Wang X, Li M, Cao C, et al. Surfactant-free palladium nanoparticles encapsulated in ZIF-8 hollow nanospheres for size-selective catalysis in liquid-phase solution [J]. ChemCatChem, 2016, 8(20): 3224-3228.
16	Yao D, Wang Y, Katherine H L, et al. Balancing effect between adsorption and diffusion on catalytic performance inside hollow nanostructured catalyst [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2019, 9(4): 2969-2976.
17	邹海魁, 初广文, 向阳, 等. 超重力反应强化技术最新进展 [J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(8): 2805-2809.
	Zou H K, Chu G W, Xiang Y, et al. New progress of HIGEE reaction technology [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2015, 66(8): 2805-2809.
18	Nakamura H, Tokuda T, Iwasaki T, et al. Numerical analysis of particle mixing in a rotating fluidized bed [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(11): 3043-3056.
19	De Broqueville A, De Wilde J. Numerical investigation of gas-solid heat transfer in rotating fluidized beds in a static geometry [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(6): 1232-1248.
20	De Wilde J, De Broqueville A. Experimental investigation of a rotating fluidized bed in a static geometry [J]. Powder Technology, 2008, 183(3): 426-435.
21	威尔特 J R, 威克斯 C E, 威尔逊 R E, 等. 动量、热量和质量传递原理 [M]. 马紫峰, 吴卫生, 译. 第4版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005: 403-463.
	Welty J R, Wicks C E, Wilson R E, et al. Fundamentals of momentum, heat and mass transfer [M]. Ma Z F, Wu W S, trans. 4th Ed. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2005: 403-463.
22	Lu J, Das S, Peters E A J F, et al. Direct numerical simulation of fluid flow and mass transfer in dense fluid-particle systems with surface reactions [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2018, 176: 1-18.
23	Lu B, Luo H, Li H, et al. Speeding up CFD simulation of fluidized bed reactor for MTO by coupling CRE model [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2016, 143: 341-350.
24	Carlos Varas A E, Peters E A J F, Kuipers J A M. Computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method (CFD-DEM) study of mass-transfer mechanisms in riser flow [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 2017, 56(19): 5558-5572.
25	Das S, Deen N G, Kuipers J A M. A DNS study of flow and heat transfer through slender fixed-bed reactors randomly packed with spherical particles [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 160: 1-19.
26	Deen N G, Kuipers J A M. Direct numerical simulation of fluid flow and mass transfer in dense fluid-particle systems [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(33): 11266-11274.
27	Lu J, Peters E A J F, Kuipers J A M. Direct numerical simulation of fluid flow and mass transfer in particle clusters [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(13): 4664-4679.
28	Lu J, Peters E A J F, Kuipers J A M. Direct numerical simulation of fluid flow and dependently coupled heat and mass transfer in fluid-particle systems [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019, 204: 203-219.
29	Lu J, Tan M D, Peters E A J F, et al. Direct numerical simulation of reactive fluid-particle systems using an immersed boundary method [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(45): 15565-15578.
30	Van Der Hoef M A, Van Sint Annaland M, Deen N G, et al. Numerical simulation of dense gas-solid fluidized beds: a multiscale modeling strategy [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 40(1): 47-70.
31	Green D W, Perry R H. Perry's chemical engineers' handbook [M]. 8th Ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002: 746-755.
32	Li J, Agarwal R K, Zhou L, et al. Investigation of a bubbling fluidized bed methanation reactor by using CFD-DEM and approximate image processing method [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019, 207: 1107-1120.
33	Christoph K, Christoph G, Alice H, et al. Models, algorithms and validation for opensource DEM and CFD-DEM [J]. Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2012, 12: 140-152.
34	Chu K W, Wang B, Xu D L, et al. CFD-DEM simulation of the gas-solid flow in a cyclone separator [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(5): 834-847.
35	Wu C, Cheng Y, Ding Y, et al. CFD-DEM simulation of gas-solid reacting flows in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(1): 542-549.
36	Gidaspow D. Multiphase flow and fluidization: continuum and kinetic theory descriptions [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1994: 421-446.
37	Tian T, Wang H, Ge W, et al. Detecting particle clusters in particle-fluid systems by a density based method [J]. Communications in Computational Physics, 2019, 26(5): 1617-1630.
38	Lu B, Zhang J, Luo H, et al. Numerical simulation of scale-up effects of methanol-to-olefins fluidized bed reactors [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 171: 244-255.
39	Tian P, Wei Y, Ye M, et al. Methanol to olefins (MTO): from fundamentals to commercialization [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2015, 5(3): 1922-1938.
40	Ying L, Yuan X, Ye M, et al. A seven lumped kinetic model for industrial catalyst in DMTO process [J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2015, 100: 179-191.
41	Zhao Y, Li H, Ye M, et al. 3D numerical simulation of a large scale MTO fluidized bed reactor [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(33): 11354-11364.
42	Das A K, Baudrez E, Marin G B, et al. Three-dimensional simulation of a fluid catalytic cracking riser reactor [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2003, 42(12): 2602-2617.
43	Trujillo W R, De Wilde J. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of fluid catalytic cracking in a rotating fluidized bed in a static geometry [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(11): 5288-5298.

[1]	毛汉林游永华吴嘉俊易正明. 高温复合SCR蓄热体的数值模拟与多目标优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(9): 881-894.
[2]	贾春桦王玮丁续王冠达魏丽燕王娟. 管壳式电加热炉结构设计对温度分布的影响研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(9): 895-904.
[3]	董鑫薛璨单永瑞冯颖张建伟. 射流强化气液两相流体动力学特性的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(8): 820-833.
[4]	丁雨晨王俊杰蔡军朱治平. 回转窑内高温气固预热燃料燃烧优化的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(7): 748-760.
[5]	张梦瑶肖亚峰董中天马少萍吴双于明州张庆华杨超. 双层组合桨气液搅拌槽流动与功耗特性的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(7): 695-705.
[6]	彭宝龙饶勇王斌. 环形中心体空化喷嘴空化特性研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(7): 669-682.
[7]	尹然吴艳崔兆雪仝立宁王晗李彬孙治谦王振波. 电场和物性参数对液滴-界面聚并行为的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(6): 598-608.
[8]	霍云婷张忠杜晓钟. 双行星螺杆式搅拌器的混合性能分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(6): 556-564.
[9]	黄正超金焱秦建涛蔡国庆凌宏志刘子钰林鹏. 炉膛和环境温度对氢基竖炉内温度-应力场的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(6): 565-578.
[10]	贾春桦白云宇赵海龙李秀明李迪王娟. 25 MW导热油炉操作弹性的模拟研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(5): 522-532.
[11]	关晶田于杰刘银杰李飞叶家元许成文卢春喜王维何险峰. 水泥回转窑内多物理场耦合模拟研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(5): 445-458.
[12]	李勇铜孙静王玮铂杨博宇杨云茜. 相变微胶囊在金属泡沫微通道中的换热特性[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(3): 233-240.
[13]	姜保成肖涛王松松郭学益王亲猛. 氧枪区位置对大型铜熔炼氧气底吹炉流动特性影响研究[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(2): 150-158.
[14]	王蓝欣关晶田于杰刘银杰李飞叶家元许成文申峻卢春喜王维. 水泥回转窑四通道煤粉燃烧器操作条件优化模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(12): 1238-1247.
[15]	程亚龙张昆明张美琪陆小菊黄永春唐湘毅刘灵惠. 自激振荡脉冲射流器液-液非均相混合特性分析[J]. 过程工程学报, 2025, 25(12): 1248-1261.

气固两相流内中空多孔催化剂性能的数值模拟

Numerical simulation of hollow catalyst with pores in gas-solid reaction system

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 21

参考文献 43

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics