欢迎访问过程工程学报, 今天是
环境与能源

全液压压裂车功率节能匹配优化

  • 杨波
展开
  • 1. 长安大学工程机械学院,陕西 西安 710064;2. 三一重型能源装备有限公司研究本院,北京 102202

收稿日期: 2016-11-03

  修回日期: 2016-12-16

  网络出版日期: 2017-08-16

基金资助

“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目

Optimization of Power Matching on Energy-saving for the Hydraulic-driven Fracturing Truck

  • Bo YANG
Expand
  • 1. School of Construction Machinery, Chang?an University, Xi?an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 
    2. Research Institute, SANY Heavy Energy Machinery Co., Ltd., Beijing 102202, China

Received date: 2016-11-03

  Revised date: 2016-12-16

  Online published: 2017-08-16

摘要

针对压裂车大功率、高油耗等特点,对采用多台发动机的全液压压裂车进行功率节能匹配优化;根据负载变化规律,采用中位数法识别负载工况;基于发动机样本和液压泵效率台架试验,采用多项式拟合算法分别建立发动机比油耗和液压泵效率模型,找到发动机油耗经济区和液压泵高效区;使用自适应惩罚函数法建立综合油耗目标函数,在各负载工况下,基于遗传算法优化输出最佳发动机转速和液压泵排量比组合,使发动机比油耗较低、液压泵效率较高,实现综合油耗最低. 结果表明,当压裂车工作压力为40?70 MPa时,新方案与原方案相比,综合节油率达30.92%?0.05%,平均节油率为6.92%?4.20%,具有较好的节油效果.

本文引用格式

杨波 . 全液压压裂车功率节能匹配优化[J]. 过程工程学报, 2017 , 17(4) : 853 -858 . DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.216344

Abstract

Aimed at fracturing truck’s characteristics of high power and consumption of fuel, optimization of power matching on energy-saving for the hydraulic-driven fracturing truck which has more than one engine was done. According to the rules of load, the median method was proposed to identify the load. Based on the specific fuel consumption of engine and the pump efficiency test data, the power matching method of lowest consumption of fuel was put forward. According to the engine sample data and pump efficiency test data, the specific fuel consumption model of engine and the efficiency model of pump were built based on the polynomial fitting algorithm. And economic areas of engine and the high efficiency area of pump were obtained. Objective function of practical fuel consumption was built based on the adaptive penalty function method. Under the circumstances of different load conditions and based on the genetic algorithm, the best combinations of engine speed and pump displacement ratio can be output to realize lower specific fuel consumption, higher pump efficiency and the lowest practical fuel consumption. And the results show that when the range of fracturing truck pressure is 40~70 MPa, the rate of saving for the practical fuel consumption is 30.92%~0.05%, and the average is 6.92%~4.20%. The new method has better fuel saving effect than the old one.

参考文献

[1]杨世平, 余浩, 刘金刚, 等.液压挖掘机动力系统功率匹配及其节能控制[J].机械工程学报, 2014, 50(5):152-160
[2]李天宇, 赵丁选, 康怀亮, 等.并联式混合动力装载机的参数匹配[J].吉林大学学报工学版, 2013, 43(4):916-921
[3]李仲兴, 王申旭, 江洪, 等.混凝土泵车动力系统功率节能匹配的研究[J].机械设计与制造, 2011, 无(6):76-78
[4]夏益民, 石鹏飞, 郭雁军, 等.型全液压式压裂车设计研究[J].石油矿场机械, 2015, 44(2):32-36
[5]叶敏, 易小刚, 蒲东亮, 等.基于遗传算法的混凝土泵车全局功率匹配[J].吉林大学学报工学版, 2015, 45(3):820-828
[6]姚怀新.工程车辆液压动力学与控制原理[M]. .北京: 人民交通出版社, 2006, :134-140
[7]朱伟伟.发动机特性建模方法的比较[J].现代车用动力, 2007, 无(2):27-30
[8]贺尚红, 杨昀梓.基于神经网络的混凝土泵车发动机万有特性建模与工况优化[J].中南大学学报自然科学版, 2010, 41(4):1398-1404
[9]徐亮.用于车辆动力学仿真的全工况发动机建模[D]. 吉林大学: 2011.
[10]刘琼荪, 周声华.基于自适应惩罚函数法的混合遗传算法[J].重庆大学学报自然科学版, 2006, 29(6):78-81
[11]M. Andalib Sahnehsaraei, M. J. Mahmoodabadi, M. Taherkhorsandi, et al..A hybrid global optimization algorithm: particle swarm optimization in association with a genetic algorithm[J].Complex System Modelling and Control Through Intelligent Soft Computations, 2014, 无(319):45-86
[12]Russell C. Eberhart, Yuhui Shi..Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization[J].Evolutionary Programming VII, 2005, 无(1447):611-616
[13]Cristina Martinez, Oscar Castillo, Oscar Montiel.Comparison between ant colony and genetic algorithms for fuzzy system optimization[J].Soft Computing for Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 2008, 无(154):71-86
[14]雷英杰, 张善文, 李续武, 等.MATLAB遗传算法工具箱及应用(第2版)[M]. .西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社, 2014, :11-61
文章导航

/