欢迎访问过程工程学报, 今天是
流动与传递

浆态床内固含率轴向分布的数值模拟

  • 史书舟 周荣涛 杨宁 宋健斐
展开
  • 1. 中国石油大学(北京)化学工程学院,北京 102249;2. 中国科学院过程工程研究所,北京 100190;3. 中国科学院大学化学科学学院,北京 100049

收稿日期: 2017-05-19

  修回日期: 2017-07-04

  网络出版日期: 2018-04-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目;国家自然科学基金青年项目;中国科学院国际合作局 对外合作重点项目

Simulation of Axial Solid Holdup in Slurry Bubble Columns

  • Shuzhou SHI Rongtao ZHOU Ning YANG Jianfei SONG
Expand
  • 1. College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China; 2. Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 3. School of Chemical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2017-05-19

  Revised date: 2017-07-04

  Online published: 2018-04-10

摘要

采用DBS曳力模型计算气液相间作用,分别采用Gidaspow曳力模型、经Brucato修正的Gidaspow曳力模型和Schiller?Naumann曳力模型计算液固相间作用,忽略气固间的直接作用,对比了浆态床内不同颗粒粒径体系轴向固含率的模拟和实验结果. 结果表明,不同液固相间曳力模型对气含率的预测影响不大;在颗粒粒径较大(140 ?m)的体系中,较低表观气速下气液DBS与液固Schiller?Naumann曳力模型组合模拟的固含率随床高度增加而减小,与实验结果吻合,而其它曳力模型组合的模拟结果较差,轴向分布较均匀;在颗粒粒径较小(35 ?m)的体系中,几种曳力模型组合的模拟结果均与实验结果吻合较好,轴向分布较均匀.

本文引用格式

史书舟 周荣涛 杨宁 宋健斐 . 浆态床内固含率轴向分布的数值模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018 , 18(2) : 258 -264 . DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217238

Abstract

DBS drag model for gas?liquid interaction, and three drag models for liquid?solid interaction including Gidaspow model, Gidaspow?Brucato model and Schiller?Naumann model were used to simulate slurry bubble columns without considering the direct interaction between gas and solid. The simulation and experimental results of axial solid holdup with different particle sizes were compared. The results showed that different liquid?solid drag models had minor influence on the prediction of gas holdup. The combination of DBS drag model and Schiller?Naumann model had a better prediction for the systems of larger particle size (140 ?m) at lower gas velocity. The solids holdup decreased with increasing the column height, whereas other models fail to predict the axial solids holdup distribution. These different liquid?solid drag models performed well for the systems of smaller particle size (35 ?m).

参考文献

[1]Grevskott S, Sann?s B H, Dudukovi? M P, et al.Liquid circulation,bubble size distributions,and solids movement in two- and three-phase bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1996, 51(10):1703-1713
[2]Michele V, Hempel D C.Liquid flow and phase holdup—measurement and CFD modeling for two-and three-phase bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(11):1899-1908
[3]Troshko A A, Zdravistch F.CFD modeling of slurry bubble column reactors for Fisher–Tropsch synthesis[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(5):892-903
[4]Feng W, Wen J, Fan J, et al.Local hydrodynamics of gas–liquid-nanoparticles three-phase fluidization[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(24):6887-6898
[5]Rados N.Slurry bubble column hydrodynamics[M]. 2003.
[6]Li W, Zhong W.CFD simulation of hydrodynamics of gas–liquid–solid three-phase bubble column[J]. Powder Technology, 2015, 286:766-788.[J].Powder Technology, 2015, 286:766-788
[7]Gandhi B, Prakash A, Bergougnou M A.Hydrodynamic behavior of slurry bubble column at high solids concentrations[J].Powder Technology, 1999, 103(2):80-94
[8]Rampure M R, Buwa V V, Ranade V V.Modelling of Gas-LiquidGas-Liquid-Solid Flows in Bubble Columns: Experiments and CFD Simulations[J].Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2010, 81(3-4):692-706
[9]Mitra-Majumdar D, Farouk B, Shah Y T.Hydrodynamic modeling of three-phase flows through a vertical column[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1997, 52(24):4485-4497
[10]Zhou R, Yang N, Li J.CFD simulation of gas-liquid-solid flow in slurry bubble columns with EMMS drag model[J]. Powder Technology, 2016.[J].Powder Technology, 2016, 314:466-479
[11]Yang N.Chapter Five – Mesoscale Transport Phenomena and Mechanisms in Gas–Liquid Reaction Systems[J]. Advances in Chemical Engineering, 2015, 46:245-280.[J].Advances in Chemical Engineering, 2015, 46:245-280
[12]Yang N, Chen J, Zhao H, et al.Explorations on the multi-scale flow structure and stability condition in bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(24):6978-6991
[13]Yang N, Wu Z, Chen J, et al.Multi-scale analysis of gas-liquid interaction and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(14):3212-3222
[14]Xiao Q, Yang N, Li J.Stability-constrained multi-fluid CFD models for gas-liquid flow in bubble columns[J].Chemical Engineeringence, 2013, 100(100):279-292
[15]Panneerselvam R, Savithri S, Surender G D.CFD modeling of gas–liquid–solid mechanically agitated contactor[J].Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2008, 86(12):1331-1344
[16]Gidaspow D, Bezburuah R, Ding J.Hydrodynamics of Circulating Fluidized Beds: Kinetic Theory Approach[J]. Engineering, 1991.[J].Engineering, 1992, :75-82
[17]Brucato A, Grisafi F, Montante G.Particle drag coefficients in turbulent fluids[J].Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(18):3295-3314
[18]Schiller L, Naumann Z.A drag coefficient correlation[J]. 1935, 77.[J].VDI Zeitung, 1935, 77:318-320
[19]Ljungqvist M, Rasmuson A.Numerical Simulation of the Two-Phase Flow in an Axially Stirred Vessel[J].Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2001, 79(5):533-546
[20]Rafique M, Chen P, Dudukovi? M P.Computational modeling of gas-liquid flow in bubble columns[J].Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 2004, 20(3-4):225-375
[21]Hooshyar N, van Ommen J R, Hamersma P J, et al.Dynamics of single rising bubbles in neutrally buoyant liquid-solid suspensions[J].Physical Review Letters, 2013, 110(110):244501-244501
[22]Wen C Y, Yu Y H.Mechanics of Fluidization[J]. Chem.engng Prog.symp.ser, 1966, 62:100-111.[J].Chemical Engineering Progress, Symposium Series, 1966, 62(1):100-111
[23]Ergun S.Fluid flow through packed columns[J].Journal of Materials Science & Chemical Engineering, 1952, 48(2):89-94
文章导航

/