欢迎访问过程工程学报, 今天是
生化工程

能源微藻表面特性对其气浮采收效率的影响

  • 沈洲 文豪 任香萤 刘珺 杨利伟 李彦鹏
展开
  • 1. 长安大学环境科学与工程学院,陕西 西安 710054;2. 长安大学旱区地下水文与生态效应教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710054; 3. 长安大学建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710061

收稿日期: 2017-07-05

  修回日期: 2017-08-27

  网络出版日期: 2018-04-10

基金资助

旱区地表- - -地下水系统界面动力学与水循环研究;可控条件下建筑环境渐近相似模拟与实验研究;绿色浮选及能源化;能源微藻气浮采收体系中气-液-固三相相互作用的物理化学机制

Influences of Surface Characteristics of Energy Microalgae on Its Harvesting Performance by Air Flotation

  • Zhou SHEN Hao WEN Xiangying REN Jun LIU Liwei YANG Yanpeng LI
Expand
  • 1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Chang?an University, Xi?an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecology in Arid Areas, Chang?an University, Xi?an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Chang?an University, Xi?an, Shaanxi 710061, China

Received date: 2017-07-05

  Revised date: 2017-08-27

  Online published: 2018-04-10

摘要

选取小球藻与鱼腥藻为代表藻种,结合微藻的表面特性与XDLVO理论,研究了影响微藻浮选采收的关键因素,根据微藻表面的电负性,用阳离子表面活性剂C16TAB浮选两种藻. 结果表明,pH为4?10时,两种藻的Zeta电位在?6.72??15.01 mV之间,均显电负性;小球藻的黏附自由能为1.21 mJ/m2,显亲水性,鱼腥藻的黏附自由能为?55.85 mJ/m2,显疏水性. 相同条件下,疏水性的鱼腥藻回收率始终高于亲水性的小球藻. 小球藻和鱼腥藻在Zeta电位最大的pH处(分别为7和8)富集比最高(分别为12.45和1.3),而回收率在pH=10时最高,表明由于液膜的排液行为,回收率和富集比无法同时达到最大值. C16TAB对微藻表面疏水性有修饰作用,加入80 mg/L C16TAB后,小球藻疏水率从19%提高到64%,回收率提高了67.38%.

本文引用格式

沈洲 文豪 任香萤 刘珺 杨利伟 李彦鹏 . 能源微藻表面特性对其气浮采收效率的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018 , 18(2) : 441 -446 . DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217271

Abstract

Two algal species Chlorella vulgaris and Anabaena vasriabilis were chosen as typical energy microalgae to investigate the surface characteristics of microaglae. The surface potential and hydrophobicity was examined based on the extend XDLVO theory. According to the Zeta potential, hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (C16TAB) was used as cationic surfactant for flotation. The results showed that both two strains carried with negative charge, and free energy of cohesion for C. vulgaris was 1.21 mJ/m2, and ?55.85 mJ/m2 for A. varsriabilis, which meant hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity respectively. A. varsriabilis performed better harvesting rate than C. vulgaris. The maximums concentration factor (12.45 for C. vulgaris and 1.3 for A. varsriabilis) toped at the pH which charged most negatively (pH=7 for C. vulgaris and pH=9 for A. varsriabilis). Nevertheless, harvesting rate toped at pH=10, which meant it could not reach the maximum with the concentration factor in the same condition, may owing to the drainage of the tonoplast. Meanwhile, after adding 80 mg/L C16TAB into the algal solution, the hydrophobicity rate for C. vulgaris raised from 19% to 64%, and the harvesting rate increased by 67.38%.

参考文献

[1] Seo Y H, Park D, Oh Y K, et al.Harvesting of microalgae cell using oxidized dye wastewater[J].Bioresource Technology, 2015, (192):802-806
[2]Kenny P, Flynn K J.In silico optimization for production of biomass and biofuel feedstocks from microalgae[J].Journal of Applied Phycology, 2015, 27(1):33-48
[3]Koberg M.Optimization of bio-diesel production from oils,cooking oils,microalgae,and castor and jatropha seeds: probing various heating sources and catalysts[J].Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(6):7460-7469
[4]Spiden E M, Yap B H J, Hill D R A, et al.Quantitative evaluation of the ease of rupture of industrially promising microalgae by high pressure homogenization[J].Bioresource Technology, 2013, 140(3):165-171
[5]Milledge J J, Heaven S.A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production[J].Reviews in Environmental Science and BioTechnology, 2013, 12(2):165-178
[6]Wu Z, Zhu Y, Huang W, et al.Evaluation of flocculation induced by pH increase for harvesting microalgae and reuse of flocculated medium[J].Bioresource technology, 2012, 110(2):496-502
[7]Prochazkova G, Safarik I, Branyik T.Harvesting microalgae with microwave synthesized magnetic microparticles[J].Bioresource Technology, 2013, 130(1):472-477
[8]Coward T, Lee J G M, Caldwell G S.Development of a foam flotation system for harvesting microalgae biomass[J].Algal Research, 2013, 2(2):135-144
[9]Ozkan A, Berberoglu H.Physico-chemical surface properties of microalgae[J].Colloids & Surfaces B Biointerfaces, 2013, 112(3):287-293
[10]Garg S, Wang L, Schenk P M.Effective harvesting of low surface-hydrophobicity microalgae by froth flotation[J].Bioresource Technology, 2014, 159(2):437-441
[11] Fowkes F M.Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion[M]// Contact angle, wettability and adhesion :. American Chemical Society, 1964:888-892.
[12]Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E.Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity[J].Fems Microbiology Letters, 1980, 9(1):29-33
[13]陈家长, 王菁, 裘丽萍, 等.对鱼腥藻和普通小球藻生长竞争的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2014, 42(2):316-320
[14]欧阳峥嵘, 温小斌, 耿亚红, 等.光照强度、温度、、盐度对小球藻光合作用的影响[J].植物科学学报, 2010, 28(1):49-55
[15]Eroglu, Melis, Anastasios.Extracellular terpenoid hydrocarbon extraction and quantitation from the green microalgae Botryococcus braunii varShowa[J].Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(7):2359-2366
[16]Callow M E, Callow J A, Ista L K, et al.Use of self-assembled monolayers of different wettabilities to study surface selection and primary adhesion processes of green algal (Enteromorpha) zoospores[J].Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 66(8):3249-3254
[17]A.F. Toussaint,PELuner,The wetting properties of grafted cellulose films[J].Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 1993, 7(6):635-648
[18]孟顺龙, 王菁, 裘丽萍, 等.氮磷质量浓度对普通小球藻和鱼腥藻生长竞争的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2015, 5(4):658-664
[19]Pi?eres J, Barraza J.Energy barrier of aggregates coal particle–bubble through the extended DLVO theory[J].International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2011, 100(1):14-20
[20]Coward T, Lee J G M, Caldwell G S.Harvesting microalgae by CTAB-aided foam flotation increases lipid recovery and improves fatty acid methyl ester characteristics[J].Biomass & Bioenergy, 2014, 67(9):354-362
[21] Zhao Y, Li Y P, Huang J, et al.Rebound and attachment involving single bubble and particle in the separation of plastics by froth flotation[J].Separation & Purification Technology, 2015, (144):123-132
文章导航

/