欢迎访问过程工程学报, 今天是
过程与工艺

炉膛高度对步进式轧钢加热炉性能的影响

  • 李浩 戴方钦 丁翠娇 郭悦
展开
  • 1. 武汉科技大学钢铁冶金及资源利用省部共建教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430081; 2. 宝武钢铁集团宝钢股份中央研究院武汉分院,湖北 武汉 430080

收稿日期: 2017-08-14

  修回日期: 2017-10-26

  网络出版日期: 2018-06-06

Effect of Furnace Height on Performance of Walking-beam Reheating Furnace

  • Hao LI Fangqin DAI Cuijiao DING Yue GUO
Expand
  • 1. Key Lab for Ferrous Metallurgy and Resources, Utilization of Ministry of Education, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430081, China; 2. Baowu Iron and Steel Group, Wuhan Branch of Baosteel Central Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430080, China

Received date: 2017-08-14

  Revised date: 2017-10-26

  Online published: 2018-06-06

摘要

以能量平衡为基础,采用辐射段法模型建立了炉气段、炉围段和钢坯表面段的能量方程组,通过钢坯表面的热流与内部导热方程耦合求解,其中炉气和炉围的温度场采用主变量修正法求解,钢坯温度场采用隐式有限差分求解,与现场实测板坯温度对比验证模型的准确性,分析了上炉膛各段高度对钢坯温度场及排烟温度的影响. 结果表明,预热段高度在0.5~0.9 m,高度每增加0.2 m,钢坯出炉时上表面温度升高约2.8℃,排烟温度降低约10℃;加热一段高度在0.9~1.9 m,高度每增加0.2 m,钢坯出炉时上表面温度平均增加2.5℃,排烟温度平均降低8.5℃;加热二段和均热段高度变化对钢坯出炉时表面温度及排烟温度影响不大. 合理确定预热段和加热一段高度有利于钢坯加热并节省燃料消耗.

本文引用格式

李浩 戴方钦 丁翠娇 郭悦 . 炉膛高度对步进式轧钢加热炉性能的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2018 , 18(3) : 551 -556 . DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217309

Abstract

Based on energy balance, energy-balance equations for gas volume zones, furnace surface zones and slab surface zones were set up by radiation zonal method, by the slab surface heat flow and internal thermal equations coupling solution. And the temperature profiles of gas volume zones and furnace surface zones were obtained by using the main variable correction method, the slabs temperature profiles by finite difference method. The correctness of the model was verified by comparing the slab temperature with the actual situation. The influence of the height of the upper furnace on the temperature field and the exhaust gas temperature of the slab were analyzed. The results showed that for the preheating section height of 0.5~0.9 m, with the height of each increase of 0.2 m, the upper surface temperature before the slab released increased by about 2.8℃, the exhaust temperature decreased by about 10℃. For the first heating section of height of 0.9~1.9 m, with the height of each increase of 0.2 m, the upper surface temperature before the slab released increased by about 2.5℃, the average exhaust gas temperature decreased by 8.5℃. The influence of the height on the temperature of the second heating section and the soaking section were not significant. It can be seen that it was reasonable to determine the height of the preheating section and the heating section to facilitate the heating of the slab and fuel consumption saving.

参考文献

[1] Song Z P, Shi J. Discussion on Industrial Furnace Energy Saving and Environmental Protection in China[J]. Industrial Furnace, 2014,36(1):1-8.
[2] Tan C K, Jenkins J, Ward J, et al. Zone Modelling of the Thermal Performances of a Large-scale Bloom Reheating Furnace[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 50(1):1111-1118.
[3] Hu Y, Tan C K, Broughton J, et al. Development of Transient Mathematical Models for a Large-scale Reheating Furnace Using Hybrid Zone-CFD Methods[J]. Energy Procedia, 2015, 75:3076-3082.
[4] Zhou W, Qiu T. Zone Modeling of Radiative Heat Transfer in Industrial Furnaces Using Adjusted Monte-Carlo Integral Method for Direct Exchange Area Calculation[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 81:161-167.
[5] Jenkins J, Ward J, Tan C K, et al. An Improved Mathematical Model to Predict the Real Time Transient Performance of a Large Steel Reheating Furnace[J]. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2011:1597-1607.
[6] Ebrahimi H, Zamaniyan A, Mohammadzadeh J S S, et al. Zonal Modeling of Radiative Heat Transfer in Industrial Furnaces Using Simplified Model for Exchange Area Calculation[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(16-17):8004-8015.
[7] Selcuk N, Siddalla R G, Beér J M. A Comparison of Mathematical Models of the Radiative Behaviour of a Large-scale Experimental Furnace[J]. Symposium on Combustion, 1977, 16(1):53-62.
[8] Vode F, Jakli? A, Kolenko T. Online Simulation Model of the Slab-Reheating Process in a Pusher-type Furnace[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2007, 27(5):1105-1114.
[9] Man Y K. A Heat Transfer Model for the Analysis of Transient Heating of the Slab in a Direct-fired Walking Beam Type Reheating Furnace[J]. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 2007, 50(19):3740-3748.
[10] Han S H, Chang D, Huh C. Efficiency Analysis of Radiative Slab Heating in a Walking-beam-type Reheating Furnace[J]. Energy, 2011, 36(2):1265-1272.
[11] 李国军, 陈海耿. 三维段法数学模型在加热炉上的应用[J]. 中国冶金, 2010, 20(3):7-7.
Li G J, Chen H G. Application of Three-Dimensional Zone Method Mathematic Model on Reheat Furnace[J]. China Metallurgy, 2010, 20(3):7-7.
[12] 赫金龙. 蓄热式加热炉段法模型研究[D]. 沈阳:东北大学, 2010,47-63.
He J L. Study of Zone Model on Regenerative Reheating Furnace[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2010,47-63.
[13] Ye G. Monte-Carlo and Number Theory Grid Method for Calculating Multiple Integrals[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2001, 41(1).
[14] 杨能彪. 一维非稳态导热问题的数值计算[J]. 青海师范大学学报(自科版), 2006, 2006(4):24-26.
Yang N B. Non-steady State Numerical Solution about One-dimensional Heat Transmition[J].Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Natural Science),2006, 2006(4):24-26.
[15] 李庆扬, 王能超, 易大义. 数值分析.第5版[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2008,159-161.
Li Q Y, Wang N C, Yi D Y. Numerical Analysis. Fifth Edition[M]. Beijing Tsinghua University Press, 2008,159-161.
[16] 赵海. 蓄热式连续加热炉数学模型的研究[D]. 沈阳:东北大学, 2001,49-52.
Zhao H. Study of the Mathematical Model for Regenerative Reheating Furnace[D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2001,49-52.
[17] 英克鲁佩勒. 传热和传质基本原理[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2007, 517.
Incropera. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer[M].Beijing: Chemical Industry Press,2007, 517.
[18] 马科夫斯基, 拉夫连契克. 加热炉控制算法[M]. 北京:冶金工业出版社, 1985,7-8.
Markovsky, Rafflesiank. Control Algorithm of Heating Furnace [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1985,7-8.
文章导航

/