用响应面分析法分析不同排液结构对新式异型折流板除雾器气液分离性能的影响，并对排液结构参数进行优化设计. 通过单因素实验对比筛选对除雾器性能具有显著影响的关键参数，用中心复合设计实验建立响应面多元回归模型，分析影响除雾器性能系数的参数间交互作用，得出最优参数. 结果表明，影响除雾器性能参数的最优取值为分离气速2.6 m/s、排液钩高度7.3 mm、前置排液槽和后置排液槽宽度分别为3.1和2.3 mm. 优化的折流板除雾器性能系数计算值为2.073，实验值为1.875，优化结果较可靠.
The influences of different drainage structures on the gas?liquid separation performance of wave-plate mist eliminator were analyzed and the parameters of drainage structure were optimized by response surface methodology. The single factor experiment was used to select the key parameters which had significant influence on the performance of the mist eliminator. The multivariate regression model was established using center compound design experiment in order to analyz the interaction of parameters which had influence on mist eliminator performance coefficient. The results showed that the key parameters which had significant influence on the performance of the mist eliminator and their values were separation gas velocity 2.6 m/s, height of drainage hook 7.3 mm, width of front-drainage pocket 3.1 mm and width of rear-drainage pocket 2.3 mm. The calculated value of mist eliminator performance coefficient was 2.073 while the test value was 1.875 which indicated that the optimization result of response surface methodology was credible.
[1] 李嘉. 波形板汽水分离器的理论与实验研究[D]. 华中科技大学, 2007.
LI J, HUANG S Y, WANG X M, et al. Experimental Research of Cold State Operation of Corrugated-plate Separator[J]. J. Huazhong Univ. of Sci. &Tech. (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 36(1): 112-114.
[2] 夏芃力, 杨静. 折流板式除沫器性能分析及研究进展[J]. 化工设备与管道, 2013, 50(6):33-36.
XIA P L, YANG J. Performance Analysis and Research Progress of Wave-plate Demister[J]. Process Equipment & Piping, 2013, 50(6): 33-36.
[3] Houghton, H.G., Radford, W.H., 1939. Measurements on Eliminators and the Development of a New Type for Use at High Gas Velocities. Trans. Am. Chem. Eng. 35, 427–433.
[4] Mcnulty K J, Monat J P, Hansen O V. Performance of Commercial Chevron Mist Eliminators[J]. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1987.
[5] Burkholz, A., Muschelknautz, E., 1972. Tropfenabscheider. Chem. Ing. Tech. 44 (8), 503–509.
[6] W?rrlein D I K. Druckverlust und Fraktionsabscheidegrad in periodisch gewinkelten Kan?len ohne Einbauten[J]. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 1975, 47(16):687-687.
[7] Ushiki K, Nishizawa E, Beniko H, et al. Performance of a Droplet Separator with Multistage Rows of Flat Blades.[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1982, 15(4):292-298.
[8] 刘丽艳, 杨静, 孔庆森,等. 折板除沫器流场与分离效率的数值模拟[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2013(8):755-761.
LIU L Y, YANG J, KONG Q L, et al. Numerical Simulations of Flow Field and Separation Efficiency for Wave-Plate Mist Eliminator[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2013, 46(8): 755-761.
[9] Azzopardi B J, Sanaullah K S. Re-entrainment in Wave-plate Mist Eliminators[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(17):3557-3563.
[10] James P W, Wang Y, Azzopardi B J, et al. The Role of Drainage Channels in the Performance of Wave-Plate Mist Eliminators[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2003, 81(6):639-648.
[11] Kavousi F, Behjat Y, Shahhosseini S. Optimal Design of Drainage Channel Geometry Parameters in Vane Demister Liquid–gas Separators[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2013, 91(7):1212-1222.
[12] 臧丽叶, 田瑞峰, 孙兰昕,等. 横掠气流作用下波形板壁降膜破裂分析[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(3):862-869.
ZANG L Y, TIAN R F, SUN L X, et al. Breakdown of Liquid Films Driven by Horizontal Gas Flow in Wave-plate Channel[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(3):862-869
[13] 赵健植, 金保升, 仲兆平,等. 基于响应曲面法的除雾器叶片效率模拟[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2007, 27(23):61-65.
ZHAO J Z, JIN B S, ZHONG Z P, et al. Simulation Study of Separation Efficiency of Demister Vane Based on Response Surface Methodology[J]. Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2007, 27(23):61-65.
[14] Venkatesan G, Kulasekharan N, Iniyan S. Design and Selection of Curved Vane Demisters Using Taguchi Based CFD Analysis[J]. Desalination, 2014, 354:39-52.
[15] Venkatesan G, Kulasekharan N, Iniyan S. Numerical Analysis of Curved Vane Demisters in Estimating Water Droplet Separation Efficiency[J]. Desalination, 2014, 339(339):40-53.
