欢迎访问过程工程学报, 今天是
环境与能源

两段式气流床氧/煤比对干煤粉气化特性的影响

  • 王力军 徐凌锋 杜晓成
展开
  • 沈阳航空航天大学能源与环境学院,辽宁 沈阳 110136

收稿日期: 2018-10-22

  修回日期: 2019-02-04

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-15

基金资助

辽宁省自然科学联合基金项目

Effect of oxygen/coal ratio of two-stage entrained flow bed on gasification characteristics of dry coal powder

  • Lijun WANG Lingfeng XU Xiaocheng DU
Expand
  • School of Energy and Environment, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110136, China

Received date: 2018-10-22

  Revised date: 2019-02-04

  Online published: 2019-08-15

Supported by

Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Joint Fund Project

摘要

基于Eulerian?Lagrangian方法建立了两段式干煤粉气流床的三维CFD计算流体动力学模型,利用均相与非均相多步化学反应动力学确定煤气化反应,用k??模型描述气相湍流流动,用随机轨道模型追踪煤粉颗粒的运动轨迹,模拟了气流床内的煤气化过程。在氧/煤质量比为0.9, 1.0和1.1时,基于文献实验条件对不同反应机理进行数值模拟,通过结果对比获得最佳反应机理。考察了氧煤比为1.0时上下两阶段煤/氧比对煤气化特性的影响。结果表明,选用焦炭和挥发物完全燃烧反应、忽略CO参与气相燃烧反应的反应机理(Case E)的模拟结果与实验数据非常吻合,误差小于2%。当一级喷嘴(A?A水平)煤和氧化剂喷入量达到并超过给煤量和进气量的50wt%时,合成气组分、碳转化率和有效成分等气化炉总体性能指标较好。在一级喷嘴喷入70wt%煤和60wt%氧气时碳转化率最大,为99.6%,一级喷嘴喷入50wt%煤和50wt%氧气时合成气组分最佳,最大合成气产率为78.24mol%。

本文引用格式

王力军 徐凌锋 杜晓成 . 两段式气流床氧/煤比对干煤粉气化特性的影响[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019 , 19(4) : 836 -844 . DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.218303

Abstract

Based on the Eulerian?Lagrangian method, a 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of a two-stage dry coal powder entrained flow gasifier was established and the coal gasification process in the entrained flow bed was simulated and analyzed using the homogeneous and heterogeneous multistep chemical reaction kinetics to define the coal gasification reaction, the k?? model was used to describe the gas phase turbulent flow, and stochastic tracking method (STM) was used to indicate motion track of char particles. At the oxygen/coal mass ratio of 0.9, 1.0 and 1.1, respectively, different reaction mechanisms were simulated to determine the optimal reaction mechanism according to the published experimental conditions. Further, the effect of coal/oxygen ratios in the upper and lower stages on the coal gasification characteristics were studied at the oxygen/coal ratio of 1.0. The results showed that the reaction mechanism adopted a complete combustion reaction of coke and volatiles and neglected the participation of CO in the gas phase combustion reaction (Case E), the simulation results was in good agreement with the experimental data with an error of less than 2%. In the case of total oxygen/coal ratio of 1.0, the reaction mechanism of Case E was selected to examine the effect of coal/oxidant between the various stages on the overall performance of the gasifier. When the primary feed (A?A) coal and oxidant reached and exceed 50wt% of the total feed, the overall performances of the gasifier such as syngas composition, carbon conversion and active ingredients were optimized. The carbon conversion rate reached 99.6% when 70wt% coal and 60wt% oxygen were injected at the first nozzle (A?A level), and the maximum synthesis gas yield was 78.24mol% when the first nozzle injected 50wt% coal and 50wt% oxygen.

参考文献

[1] Unlu A, Kayahan U. Pilot scale entrained flow gasification of Turkish lignites [J]. Energy Inst., 2017, 90: 159-165.
[2] Dalia A A, Mamdouh A G, Omar Y A, et al. Co-gasification of coal and biomass wastes in an entrained flow gasifier modelling, simulation and integration opportunities [J]. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2017, 37: 126-137.
[3] Ahmad R, Saleem I., Clean Hydrogen Energy and Electric Power Production with CO2 Capturing by Using Coal Gasification [J]. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 2016,35: 143-152.
[4] Dmitry S, Thomas F, Daniel S. Numerical study on entrained-flow gasification performance using combined slag model and experimental characterization of slag properties [J]. Fuel Process. Technol., 2017, 161: 62–75.
[7] Michele V, Rahul A, Christian H. Simulation of entrained flow gasification with advanced coal conversion submodels. Part2: Char conversion [J]. Fuel, 2014, 118: 369–384.
[8] Wen C Y, Chaung T Z. Entrainment coal gasification modeling [J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 1979, 18(4): 684-695.
[9] Chen C, Horio M, Kojima T. Use of numerical modeling in the design and scale-up of entrained ?ow coal gasi?ers [J]. Fuel, 2001, 80: 1513–1523.
[10] Choi Y C, Li X Y, Park T J. Numerical study on the coal gasification characteristics in an entrained flow coal gasifier [J]. Fuel, 2001, 80(15): 2193-2201.
[11] Shi S, Zitney S E, Shahnam M. Modelling coal gasification with CFD and discrete phase method [J]. Energ. Inst., 2006, 79(4): 217-221.
[12] Vicente W, Ochoa S, Aguillón J. An Eulerian model for the simulation of an entrained flow coal gasifier [J]. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2003, 23(15): 1993-2008.
[13] Gerun L, Paraschiv M, Vijeu R, et al. Numerical investigation of the partial oxidation in a two-stage downdraft gasifier[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87(7): 1383-1393.
[14] Bouma P H, De G L, Tummers M J. Numerical modelling of an entrained-flow gasification simulator [C]. Asme Pressure Vessels Piping Div Publ PVP, 1999,397: 227-235.
[15] Guenther C, Breault R. The effect of gas–solids dispersion on a two fluid model of a transport gasifier [C]. AIChE annual meeting and fall showcase. Cincinnati, OH, 2005.
[16] Alvarez L, Gharebaghi M, Jones J M, et al. Numerical investigation of NO emissions from an entrained flow reactor under oxy-coal conditions [J]. Fuel Process. Technol., 2012, 93(1): 53-64.
[17] Wang L J, Jia Y J, Sunel K, et al. Numerical analysis on the influential factors of coal gasification performance in two-stage entrained flow gasifier, Appl. Therm. Eng., 2017, 112: 1601–1611.
[18] Gao X Y, Zhang Y N, Li B X, et al. Model development for biomass gasification in an entrained flow gasifier using intrinsic reaction rate submodel [J]. Energ. Convers. Manage., 2016, 10: 120–131.
[19] Hyo J J, Dong K S, Jungho H. CFD modeling for coal size effect on coal gasification in a two-stage commercial entrained-bed gasifier with an improved char gasification model [J]. Appl. Energ., 2014, 123: 29–36.
[20] Unar I N, Wang L J, Pathan A G, et al. Numerical simulations for the coal/oxidant distribution effects between two-stages for multi opposite burners(MOB) gasifier [J]. Energ. Convers. Manage., 2014, 86: 670-682.
[21] Saiful A M, Wijayanta A T, Nakaso K. Redictions of O2/N2 and O2/CO2 Mixture Effects during Coal Combustion using Probability Density Function [J]. novel carbon res., 2010, 2: 12-16.
[22] Dong C, Yang Y, Yang R. Numerical modeling of the gasification based biomass co-firing in a 600MW pulverized coal boile [J]. Appl. Energ., 2010 87(9): 2834-2838.
[23] Van H C, Kong S C. Performance characteristics of a pilot-scale biomass gasifier using oxygen-enriched air and steam [J]. Fuel, 2013, 103: 987-996.
[24] Jae G L, Jae H K, Hyo J L. Characteristics of entrained flow coal gasification in a drop tube reactor [J]. Fuel, 1996, 75(9): 1035-1042.
[25] Silva V B, Rouboa A. Using a two-stage equilibrium model to simulate oxygen air enriched gasification of pine biomass residues [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 109: 111-117.
[26] Xu S S, Ren Y Q, Wang B M, et al. Development of a novel 2-stage entrained flow coal dry powder gasifier [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113: 318-323.
[27] Silaen A, Wang T. Effect of turbulence and devolatilization models on coal gasification simulation in an entrained-flow [J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 2010, 53(9): 2074-2091.
[28] Jones W P, Launder B E, The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence [J]. Int. J. heat mass tran., 1972,15(2): 301-314.
[29] Du S W, Chen W H, Lucas J. Performances of pulverized coal injection in blowpipe and tuyere at various operational conditions [J]. Energ. Convers. Manage., 2007,48(7): 2069-2076.
[30] Steiler J M, Lao D, Lebonvallet J L. Development of coal injection in the blast furnace at Usinor Sacilor [J]. Inject Technol. Iron Mak Steel Mak Proc., 1996, 15–32 .
[31] Du S W, Chen W H. Numerical prediction and practical improvement of pulverized coal combustion in blast furnace [J]. Int. Commun. Heat Mass, 2006, 33(3): 327-334.
[32] Ubhayakar S K, Stickler D B, Von Rosenberg C W. Rapid devolatilization of pulverized coal in hot combustion gases [J]. Symp. (Int.) Combust., 1977, 16(1): 427-436.
[33] Watanabe H, Otaka M. Numerical simulation of coal gasification in entrained flow coal gasifier [J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(12):1935-1943.
[34] Jianjun N, Qinfeng L, Zhijie Z. Numerical and experimental investigations on gas-particle flow in the Opposed Multi-burner Gasifier [J]. Energy conversion and management, 2009, 50(12):3035-3044.
[35] Seo H K, Park S, Lee J, et al. Effects of operating factors in the coal gasification reaction [J]. Korean J Chem Eng, 2011, 28:1851–1858.
[36] Lu X, Wang T. Water–gas shift modeling in coal gasification in an entrainedflow gasifier. Part 1: development of methodology and model calibration [J]. Fuel, 2013, 108:629–638.
[37] Lu X, Wang T. Water–gas shift modeling in coal gasification in an entrainedflow gasifier–Part 2: gasification application [J]. Fuel, 2013, 108: 620–628.
文章导航

/