套管屈服强度直接影响套管抗挤压性能，套管在加工孔过程中可能诱发孔眼附近材料发生金属相变，导致套管屈服强度不再均匀分布，进而影响套管抗挤压强度。在相同工况下，对比了P110完整套管和机加工孔套管的抗挤压强度，以此为参照组分析了相变区域面积和相变区域屈服强度对机加工孔套管抗挤压强度的影响。结果表明，机加工孔会改变材料屈服强度，进而影响套管抗挤压性能。随金属相变区域屈服强度减小，机加工孔套管抗挤压强度减弱；当金属相变区域屈服强度增大时，机加工孔套管抗挤压强度增强。且机加工孔套管相变区域面积对机加工孔套管抗挤压强度的影响随相变区域屈服强度增加而逐渐削弱。
The yield strength of the casing directly affects the anti-extrusion performance of the casing. During the processing of casing hole, metal phase transformation may happen in the material near the hole. Thus the yield strength is no longer uniform in the whole casing, which affects the crushing strength of the casing. Taking the P110 casing as an example, the crushing strength of the complete casing and the machined hole casing under the same working conditions were compared. And as a reference group, the influence of the area of the phase transition region and the yield strength of the phase transition region on the crushing strength of the machined hole casing were analyzed. The results showed that the machined hole changed the yield strength of the material, which affected the anti-extrusion performance of the casing. When the yield strength of the metal phase transition region reduced, the extrusion strength of the machined hole reduced, and when the yield strength of the metal phase transition region increased, the extrusion strength of the machined hole increased. And the effect of the phase transition region of the machined hole casing on the extrusion strength of the machined hole casing was gradually weakened with the increase of the yield strength in the phase transition region.
[1] 贾曦雨,王树山,马峰,唐凯,陈华彬,马小强,潘德凯.射孔冲击相变对射孔套管抗挤性能的影响[J].石油学报,2017,38(03):348-355.
Jia Yuyu, Wang Shushan, Ma Feng, Tang Kai, Chen Huabin, Ma Xiaoqiang, Pan Dekai.Influence of perforation impact phase change on the anti-squeezing performance of perforated casing[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(03):348-355.
[2] 张立民.冀东油田出砂井射孔套管变形分析[J].石油钻采工艺,2013,35(05):71-73.
Zhang Limin.Analysis of the deformation of perforated casing in sand production well in Jidong Oilfield[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2013,35(05):71-73.
[3] 许爱荣,邹云,杨向同,窦益华.内压作用下含裂纹射孔套管临界开裂应力分析[J].石油机械,2012,40(04):22-25.
Xu Airong,Zou Yun,Yang Xiangtong,Dou Yihua.Analysis of critical cracking stress of perforated casing with crack under internal pressure[J].Petroleum Machinery,2012,40(04):22-25.
[4] 丁祖鹏,罗艳艳,韩彬,邓彩凤.射孔对套管抗挤强度的影响分析与试验[J].钻采工艺,2016,39(04):15-18+2.
Ding Zupeng,Luo Yanyan,Han Bin,Deng Caifeng.Analysis and Experiment of Influence of Perforation on Squeezing Strength of Casing[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2016,39(04):15-18+2.
[5] 佟光军,胡知辉,于莉,唐彪.深水海底管道屈曲扩展非线性有限元分析[J].石油工程建设,2018,44(05):11-15+65.
Shu Guangjun,Hu Zhihui,Yu Li,Tang Wei.Nonlinear finite element analysis of buckling expansion of deepwater submarine pipeline[J].Petroleum Engineering Construction,2018,44(05):11-15+65.
[6] Roberto Casado-Vara,Pablo Chamoso,Fernando De la Prieta,Javier Prieto,Juan M. Corchado. Non-linear adaptive closed-loop control system for improved efficiency in IoT-blockchain management[J]. Information Fusion,2019,49.
[7] Elsayed M.E. Zayed,Abdul-Ghani Al-Nowehy,Reham M.A. Shohib. New sub-equation method to construct solitons and other solutions for perturbed nonlinear Schr?dinger equation with Kerr law nonlinearity in optical fiber materials[J]. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science,2018.
[8] 李彬. 薄壁构件稳定性分析[D].大连理工大学,2016.
[9] 罗天洋. 浅水域钢管式栈桥平台结构设计研究[D].合肥工业大学,2016.
[10] 王骁峰,段毅,袁锐之.薄壁硬壳式圆筒结构的屈曲分析[J].兵器装备工程学报,2018,39(07):166-170.
Wang Yifeng,Duan Yi,Yuan Ruizhi.Buckling Analysis of Thin-walled Hard-shell Cylinder Structure[J].Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering,2018,39(07):166-170.
[11] 王欣,范雯霖,高顺德.基于弧长法的臂架非线性稳定性分析[J].起重运输机械,2018(11):127-132.
Wang Xin, Fan Wenlin, Gao Shunde.Analysis of Nonlinear Stability of Boom Based on Arc Length Method[J].Lifting and Transport Machinery,2018(11):127-132.
[12] 魏鹏,李建光,李延强,陈超.从一实例分析看弧长法与牛顿—拉普森法[J].科技与创新,2018(24):5-6+12.
Wei Peng, Li Jianguang, Li Yanqiang, Chen Chao. A case study of arc length method and Newton-Raphson method [J]. Science, Technology and Innovation, 2018 (24): 5 / 612.
