欢迎访问过程工程学报, 今天是
环境与能源

短链多硫化物在离子液体中聚集行为的分子动力学模拟

  • 胡天媛 ,
  • 王艳磊 ,
  • 霍锋 ,
  • 何宏艳
展开
  • 1.中国科学院过程工程研究所,多相复杂系统国家重点实验室,离子液体清洁过程北京市重点实验室,北京 100190
    2.中国科学院大学化学工程学院,北京 100049
胡天媛(1995-),女,安徽省池州市人,硕士研究生,化学工程专业,E-mail: tyhu18@ipe.ac.cn
霍锋,通讯联系人,E-mail: huofeng@ipe.ac.cn.

收稿日期: 2020-07-13

  修回日期: 2020-07-25

  网络出版日期: 2021-07-27

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(21878295);北京市自然科学基金资助项目(2192052);前沿学科重点研究项目(QYZDB-SSW-SLH022)

Molecular dynamics simulations of short-chain lithium polysulfides clustering in ionic liquids

  • Tianyuan HU ,
  • Yanlei WANG ,
  • Feng HUO ,
  • Hongyan HE
Expand
  • 1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Process, State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
    2.School of Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2020-07-13

  Revised date: 2020-07-25

  Online published: 2021-07-27

摘要

离子液体因其优异的物化性质、能抑制多硫化物溶解等特点,近年来被广泛应用于锂硫电池电解液中。在电池充放电产物中,难溶性Li2S和Li2S2易聚集沉积在电极表面,影响电池性能,而目前关于其团聚行为与电解液性质的微观机理研究较少。本工作利用量化计算和分子动力学模拟分析了短链Li2S和Li2S2在离子液体中的微观结构以及形成团簇的情况。通过分析体系的微观结构发现,阳离子中主要与S作用的是侧链甲基,短链多硫化物之间Li-S作用远强于与阴离子的Li-O作用。团簇尺寸分布的结果表明,短链多硫化物在[TFSI]型离子液体中易形成多分子的大团簇,Li2S2体系比Li2S体系中的大团簇比例更高;离子液体阴离子配位能力越强,形成大的Li2S团簇比例越少,但阴离子的构型特点和作用形式也会对团簇的尺寸结构造成影响。

本文引用格式

胡天媛 , 王艳磊 , 霍锋 , 何宏艳 . 短链多硫化物在离子液体中聚集行为的分子动力学模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2021 , 21(7) : 847 -856 . DOI: 10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.220221

Abstract

Ionic liquids have been widely used in lithium-sulfur battery electrolytes in recent years due to their excellent physicochemical properties and the ability to inhibit the dissolution of lithium polysulfides intermediates. Among those products during the battery cycling processes, insoluble Li2S and Li2S2 are inclined to aggregate and deposit on the electrode surface, affecting the battery performance. However, there are few studies on the microscopic mechanism of their clustering behaviors and electrolyte properties. In this work, the microstructure of Li2S/Li2S2 in ionic liquids and the formation of clusters were studied by DFT calculations and molecular dynamics simulations. From the optimized configurations using DFT methods, it can be seen that ionic liquids and Li2S/Li2S2 always tended to form a "cation-short chain polysulfide-anion" sandwich-like structures. By analyzing the microstructures of the molecular dynamics simulation systems, it can be found that the methyl group in side chain of cation mainly interacted with S in Li2S/Li2S2, and the Li-S interaction between short-chain polysulfides was much stronger than Li-O interaction in anions. The results of cluster size distribution showed that short-chain polysulfides were more likely to form large clusters in the [TFSI]-based ionic liquid, while the proportion of large clusters in Li2S2 system was higher than Li2S systems. Moreover, the tendency of forming large clusters increased with the concentration of Li2S/Li2S2. Additionally, stronger coordination ability of anions brought smaller proportion of large Li2S clusters. However, the configuration characteristics and interaction forms of anions-Li2S will also affected the sizes and structures of clusters. These understandings could provide theoretical guidance for future systematic studies on screening and designing ionic liquids electrolytes for lithium-sulfur batteries.

参考文献

1 Zhu J, Zou J L, Cheng H, et al. High energy batteries based on sulfur cathode [J]. Green Energy & Environment, 2019, 4(4): 345-359.
2 Pan H, Wei X, Henderson W A, et al. On the way toward understanding solution chemistry of lithium polysulfides for high energy Li-S redox flow batteries [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2015, 5(16): 1500113.
3 Pan H L, Chen J Z, Cao R G, et al. Non-encapsulation approach for high-performance Li-S batteries through controlled nucleation and growth [J]. Nature Energy, 2017, 2(10): 813-820.
4 Vijayakumar M, Govind N, Walter E, et al. Molecular structure and stability of dissolved lithium polysulfide species [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16(22): 10923-10932.
5 Barchasz C, Molton F, Duboc C, et al. Lithium/sulfur cell discharge mechanism: an original approach for intermediate species identification [J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2012, 84(9): 3973-3980.
6 Cuisinier M, Hart C, Balasubramanian M, et al. Radical or not radical: revisiting lithium-sulfur electrochemistry in nonaqueous electrolytes [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2015, 5(16): 1401801.
7 Zhang G, Peng H J, Zhao C Z, et al. The radical pathway based on a lithium-metal-compatible high-dielectric electrolyte for lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(51): 16732-16736.
8 Chu H, Noh H, Kim Y J, et al. Achieving three-dimensional lithium sulfide growth in lithium-sulfur batteries using high-donor-number anions [J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 188.
9 Wang B, Alhassan S M, Pantelides S T. Formation of large polysulfide complexes during the lithium-sulfur battery discharge [J]. Physical Review Applied, 2014, 2(3): 034004.
10 Yu T, Li F, Liu C Y, et al. Understanding the role of lithium sulfide clusters in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(19): 9293-9298.
11 Partovi-Azar P, Kühne T D, Kaghazchi P. Evidence for the existence of Li2S2 clusters in lithium-sulfur batteries: ab initio Raman spectroscopy simulation [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015, 17(34): 22009-22014.
12 Gupta A, Bhargav A, Jones J P, et al. Influence of lithium polysulfide clustering on the kinetics of electrochemical conversion in lithium-sulfur batteries [J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2020, 32(5): 2070-2077.
13 Park C, Ronneburg A, Risse S, et al. Structural and transport properties of Li/S battery electrolytes: role of the polysulfide species [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019, 123(16): 10167-10177.
14 Andersen A, Rajput N N, Han K S, et al. Structure and dynamics of polysulfide clusters in a nonaqueous solvent mixture of 1,3-dioxolane and 1,2-dimethoxyethane [J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2019, 31(7): 2308-2319.
15 Xiao J W, Zhou G M, Chen H T, et al. Elaboration of aggregated polysulfide phases: from molecules to large clusters and solid phases [J]. Nano Letters, 2019, 19(10): 7487-7493.
16 Dong K, Liu X M, Dong H F, et al. Multiscale Studies on Ionic Liquids [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117(10): 6636-6695.
17 Zhang L, Dong K, Chen S M, et al. Novel ionic liquid based electrolyte for double layer capacitors with enhanced high potential stability [J]. Science China Chemistry, 2016, 59(5): 547-550.
18 Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1995, 117(1): 1-19.
19 Zhong X J, Liu Z P, Cao D P. Improved classical united-atom force field for imidazolium-based ionic liquids: tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate, methylsulfate, trifluoromethylsulfonate, acetate, trifluoroacetate, and bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2011, 115(33): 10027-10040.
20 Jorgensen W L, Maxwell D S, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1996, 118(45): 11225-11236.
21 Rizzo R C, Jorgensen W L. OPLS all-atom model for amines:? resolution of the amine hydration problem [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1999, 121(20): 4827-4836.
22 Bazito F F C, Kawano Y, Torresi R M. Synthesis and characterization of two ionic liquids with emphasis on their chemical stability towards metallic lithium [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 52(23): 6427-6437.
23 Tokuda H, Ishii K, Susan M A B H, et al. Physicochemical properties and structures of room-temperature ionic liquids. 3. variation of cationic structures [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110(6): 2833-2839.
24 Gardas R L, Costa H F, Freire M G, et al. Densities and derived thermodynamic properties of imidazolium-, pyridinium-, pyrrolidinium-, and piperidinium-based ionic liquids [J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2008, 53(3): 805-811.
25 Liu Z X, Hubble D, Balbuena P B, et al. Adsorption of insoluble polysulfides Li2S x (x=1, 2) on Li2S surfaces [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015, 17(14): 9032-9039.
26 Zou W L, Kalescky R, Kraka E, et al. Relating normal vibrational modes to local vibrational modes with the help of an adiabatic connection scheme [J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2012, 137(8): 084114.
27 Cornell W D, Cieplak P, Bayly C I, et al. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1995, 117(19): 5179-5197.
28 Ou X W, Yu Y Z, Wu R, et al. Shuttle suppression by polymer-sealed graphene-coated polypropylene separator [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(6): 5534-5542.
29 Islam M M, Ostadhossein A, Borodin O, et al. ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations on lithiated sulfur cathode materials [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015, 17(5): 3383-3393.
30 Pastorino C, Gamba Z. Test of a simple and flexible S8 model molecule in α-S8 crystals [J]. Chemical Physics Letters, 2000, 319(1): 20-26.
31 Frisch M, Trucks G, Schlegel H B, et al. Gaussian 09 [M]. Revision d. 01. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian Inc., 2009: 28.
32 Martínez L, Andrade R, Birgin E G, et al. PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations [J]. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2009, 30(13): 2157-2164.
33 Molinari N, Mailoa J P, Kozinsky B. Effect of salt concentration on ion clustering and transport in polymer solid electrolytes: a molecular dynamics study of PEO-LiTFSI [J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2018, 30(18): 6298-6306.
34 Schmeisser M, Illner P, Puchta R, et al. Gutmann donor and acceptor numbers for ionic liquids [J]. Chemistry-A European Journal, 2012, 18(35): 10969-10982.
文章导航

/